Archive for the ‘Andrew Fox’ Category

« Older Entries

Democrats, wasn't the Health Care bill supposed to reduce costs?

PostDateIcon September 9th, 2010

Then why are they rising? And, perhaps equally important, why is Fox News the only media outlet covering this? It’s ok liberals. You can still read it even though it’s on Fox News. It’s an AP article so it’s not like Andrew Breitbart wrote it.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/…


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 6 Comments »

What Lakers team did you like better?

PostDateIcon September 7th, 2010

Early 00′s: prime Shaquille O’Neal, young Kobe Bryant, ‘Big Shot’ Robert Horry, Derek Fisher and Rick Fox

Late 00′s: Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum, Lamar Odom and Derek Fisher


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 8 Comments »

If this "passes" what's next in the Cloward/Piven playbook?

PostDateIcon September 6th, 2010

As I’m sure Obama assured Rep Luis Guiterrez, the next step is Amnesty for Illegals. Do the math folks. If 20 Million illegals are magically transformed into citizens…then allowed to import their family members in the name of "compassion" what’s that get you? A conservative estimate would be 60 MILLION or more!

The Cloward/Piven Strategy is named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Their goal is to overthrow capitalism by overwhelming the government bureaucracy with entitlement demands. The created crisis provides the impetus to bring about radical political change.

Is Amnesty for Illegals the next step in the playbook?

"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America!" – Barack Obama

For the record I opposed this when Bush, McCain, and Graham were pushing it. In fact nearly 85% of the country did. Now we’ll see just how blind Obama’s followers are.
Think about this people. 60 Million is the population of Texas and California COMBINED!


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 8 Comments »

The Right "Refudiates" any racists are amongst them yet they hold Andrew Brightbart up high,are they blind?

PostDateIcon September 3rd, 2010

Brightbart is called a racist by most people with his recent attempt to divide the nation with his Sherrod edited video. Does this show us just how desperate that he, that he has to once again make up stories and pad them with lies? Yet the Right takes him seriously. They believed him when he made up the prostitute and pimp tapes fro Acorn, all of which were found to be edited lies. Fox News ran with that too. Is is fairly easy to see that those on the Right either want to believe him or are themselves racists and agree with this type of sleazy false reporting?


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 8 Comments »

Should Andrew Breitbart get a medal?

PostDateIcon September 1st, 2010

In one fell swoop, Breitbart exposed rampant racism in the NAACP when he showed a film clip of NAACP racists laughing and cheering as Shirley Sherrod told her tale of ‘sticking it to whitey’, while simultaneously exposing Obama as a knee-jerk reactionary. Obama was so intent on shifting the focus off of NAACP racism that he threw Sherrod under the bus before hearing her side.
Now the White house is throwing the Agriculture Secretary under the bus too by lying that he fired her on his own. Sherrod specifically stated several times that it was "The White House who told me to pull over my car and resign immediately".

P.S. How can the left blame Fox for any of this? Obama fired Sherrod at least 4 hours BEFORE Fox ever reported on the story!


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 19 Comments »

Do you agree with Judge Andrew Napolitano about the AZ law & Bush's Solicitor Gen. Ted Olson on Prop 8.?

PostDateIcon August 30th, 2010

Judge Napolitano – ‘Arizona Statute Is UnConstitutional’ :

Conservative Ted Olson- "Destroys Fox News On Gay Marriage":

the law is clearly on their side, so on what grounds do you disagree?


Related Blogs

     Mail this post

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

    PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 6 Comments »

    Even Glenn Beck apologized to Shirley Sherrod and said she shouldn't have been fired?

    PostDateIcon August 28th, 2010

    I was shocked that Glenn Beck defended Shirley Sherrod he admitted the Fox News got it wrong and they were fooled by Andrew Breitbart.

    But Cons on yahoo are still calling her a racist even after its been proven that the tapes were edited Out of Context by the lying scum Andrew Breitbart.


    Related Blogs

     Mail this post

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

    PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 15 Comments »

    Is anyone else surprised that a Tea Party Activist and frequent Fox News analyst…?

    PostDateIcon August 26th, 2010

    Andrew Breitbart would take a speech out of context and ruin someone’s career? Hows that hopey changey thingy?

    http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/watch_full_video_of_sherrods_speech.php

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/36784_Resigned_USDA_Official-_Breitbarts_Video_Was_a_Lie


    Related Blogs

     Mail this post

    Technorati Tags: , , ,

    PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , | PostCommentsIcon 5 Comments »

    Is Andrew Breitbart is a media genius?

    PostDateIcon August 24th, 2010

    Andrew Breitbart is a media genius.

    He proved it originally with his brilliant handling of the ACORN ‘hooker’ scandal which
    he skillfully manipulated so that the corrupt media was forced, against its will, to
    broadcast corruption in one of Obama’s most powerful political support groups. But
    Breitbart’s handing of that affair is nothing compared to his brilliant manipulation of
    the Shirley Sherrod ‘white farmer’ scandal.

    It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror, Breitbart
    released a snippet of a tape on his "Big Government" site which showed an
    obscure black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture laughing to a roomful of NAACP
    members about how she’d discriminated against a destitute white farmer and refused to
    give him the financial aid he desperately needed. As she smirked to the room, she’d sent
    him instead to a white lawyer – ‘one of his own kind’ – for help. The black woman was
    Shirley Sherrod – and almost immediately she became the center of a firestorm of
    controversy which exploded throughout the country. Within a day of the release of that
    infamous tape, the head of the Dept. of Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded – and
    received – Sherrod’s resignation. Breitbart had won.

    But then seemingly Breitbart’s actions began to explode in his face. As Sherrod screamed
    in protest, FOX News released the entire text of her speech last March to the NAACP. And
    there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly repenting of her racism against a white farmer
    and instead championing his fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat. Within hours of
    that entire tape being revealed, the entire world turned against Andrew Breitbart.
    Conservatives throughout the country were enraged that he’d endangered their reputations
    by releasing a ‘doctored’ tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had dealt a fatal blow to the
    conservative media. I confess that I also was horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness
    and stupidity of Breitbart in ‘doctoring’ a tape to make a supposedly innocent woman look
    guilty. But now I discover I have been as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart as
    the Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.

    Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart’s release of that tape snippet.
    It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media into exposing one of the most shocking
    examples of corruption in the federal government – a little known legal case called
    "Pigford v. Glickman".

    http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/07/27/pigford-v-glickman-86000-claims-from-39697-total

    -farmers/?singlepage=true

    "In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of
    Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to racial
    discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997." The case was entitled "Pigford
    v. Glickman" and in 1999, the black farmers won their case. The government agreed
    to pay each of them as much as ,000 to settle their claims.

    But then on February 23 of this year, something shocking happened in relation to that
    original judgment. In total silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to
    "Pigford". The amount was a staggering .25 billion. This was because the
    original number of plaintiffs – 400 black farmers – had now swollen in a class action
    suit to include a total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America.

    There was only one teensy problem. The United States of America doesn’t have 86,000
    black farmers. According to accurate and totally verified census data, the total number
    of black farmers throughout America is only 39,697. Oops.

    Well, gosh – how on earth did 39,697 explode into 86,000 claims? And how did ,000
    explode into .25 billion? Well, folks, you’ll just have to ask the woman who not only
    spearheaded this case because of her position in 1997 at the "Rural Development
    Leadership Network" but whose family received the highest single payout
    (approximately million) from that action – Shirley Sherrod. Oops again.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/story/110/024/Is_There_More_to_Sherrods_Dismissal.html

    Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed herself as the
    perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the United States – a fraud enabled
    solely because she screamed racism at the government and cowed them into submission. And
    it gets even more interesting. Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and
    abetted her in this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford
    v. Glickman" in 1999 only applied to a total of 16,000 black farmers. But in 2008,
    a junior Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allo


    Related Blogs

     Mail this post

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 6 Comments »

    Fox News/Breitbart fans, please justify this?

    PostDateIcon August 23rd, 2010

    About this Sherrod thing.

    Ok, there are a lot of different angles to this story, the NAACP, Obama’s response, the speech itself. But there is one angle which I feel has been painfully under reported. Andrew Breitbart is an influential Internet reporter, and in this case, perhaps others, he didn’t bother to check his sources. I’ve never taken a journalism class in my life and I think that’s pathetic. It’s like a doctor not washing his hands before surgery. It’s an embarrassment to journalism ethics.

    And yet Fox only mentions this in passing, and his only appearance on Fox was on Hannity! HANNITY. For God’s sake, if he showed up on O’Reily he would have gotten drilled to the wall on this issue, but he picked the one host who would look past his complete and utter failure as a journalist. You can see it all in a video entitled "Andrew Breitbart Defends Sherrod story" It’s found right next to the video called "NAACP Race Card Fraud"

    Now I’ve heard the reason that Brietbart didn’t have the time. But how could he not have the time to fact check a video that is years old? That makes no sense to me. Nor can I understand why a network that prides itself on being fair and balanced, and according to O’Reily is as a result increasing viewership completely ignore this angel to the Sherrod story. Could somebody explain this to me.


    Related Blogs

     Mail this post

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    PostCategoryIcon Posted in Andrew Fox | PostTagIcon Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | PostCommentsIcon 5 Comments »
    « Older Entries
    • Fill In The Information Below
    Featured Lethal Products
    Get In CPA NetWorks
    Categories
    Commission Payload Post
    Tags

    Contact Us | Terms of Use | Trademarks | Privacy Statement
    Copyright © 2009 Affiliate Marketing-Super Affiliates-Affiliate Marketing Course. All Rights Reserved.

    Internet Marketing Themes | Internet Marketing Strategies

    Powered by Yahoo! Answers