Are Foxnews fans/views dispointed with Andrew Breitbart?
August 8th, 2010
I’m not slamming fox but curious if viewers disappointed with the latest incident regarding Breitbart? Fox has come under fire for being biased to the right and Breitbart doesn’t help their cause in demonstrating "Fair and balanced" journalism.
Related Blogs
- Snoring – Can Snoring Cause Sleep Apnea? | Snoring Health
- How The Guardian is pioneering data journalism with free tools …
- Use the Keyword Internet Marketing Tools Right | Foodit
- PJNet – Blog – Eric Newton: 4 Transformational Trends in …
- Disaster Alert: Transportation Incident in Missouri « American Red …
- Free Streaming Live NBC, CBS, ABC and FOX Free on a PC without …
- Why & Quot; Toning Up & Quot; Can Spell Disaster for Your Fitness …
- wow gold for sale " « Power Leveling KAW
- At the fair – Beyond The Commons – Macleans.ca
- Uptown Art Fair 2010
- Clark County Fair
- Sussex County Fair
- Hajna Moss-Fishburne: Montana Fishburne's Mother » Right Celebrity
- Noble cause: Local man beats Bank of America | The Hook News Blog
- Fox News Forgets Bush Labels Afghanistan Obama's War
- First Look: Megan Fox For Armani Jeans | Pink is the New Blog …
- Child & Adolescent Mental Health: the Right Career at the Right …
- News Corpse » Fox News: Last In Online Ratings:
- Download Free HD Movie Incident at Loch Ness (2004) – Watch Online …
- The Fair
Mail this post
Posted in 
Tags:
Fox News will provide cover and deflection for Andrew Breitbart and the sheeple will fall for it. They always do.
NO, they enjoy extremists like Breitbart although intelligent Americans find Breibart to be an irrelevant attention seeking hate monger
They bought the ACORN pimp garbage, so I really wouldn’t call this a new low for them. This actually doesn’t surprise me. I know these people by now.
FOX is right-leaning, but only as far as CNN and MSNBC are to the left (and NPR and ABC and . . . ).
Unlike liberals, I can provide peer-reviewed science as proof. They cannot because they don’t have any:
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/groseclose/Media.Bias.8.htm
No, I am not. Something stinks about the way this all came down, and bottom line, Shirley is a racist, the NAACP is racist, and the President is racist. So, I will be watching for the next chapter, and it will come.
Further, Glenn took her side after she quit, and FOX didn’t air anything until she quit, so sell your spin to someone who buys it.
Yes I am. Conservatives should never resort to doing what the left does regularly.
No, if you don`t make a mistake every now and then it means you are doing nothing, at least He is doing his best to help The Country by keeping us all informed.
Have you looked at msnbc and cnn they obviously swing to the left and they are very bias fox news is fair and balanced
Heck No – - – they just wish that he had been a bit more savvy with his pressentation such as a second doctored video or a slew of such tripe. FOX prides itself on beingthe propaganda wing for the Tea Baggers and takes pride in lies & deception.
Peace////////\
Rumor has itthat there is a shrine to Josef Goebbels in the Fox News Corp Headquarters and that the faithful pray to Goebbels Image!
Yeah, Breitbart should have waited to see the whole video before posting it. He basically has done what other news sources have done before and run a story without authenticating the source or waited for context. Rathergate anyone?
But what drives me crazy are the people like Olbermann who thrive and purposefully take statements made and use them out of context feigning rage over Breitbart’s mistake.
You’re kidding! I think Breitbart is a hero! I hope he runs for office soon.
The dems are succeeding in diverting the real story of racism in the NAACP to "kill the messenger" tactics. It will backfire…but not on FNC…because people now see the propaganda the libs are putting out now.
FNC may be unfairly under fire by those who seek its demise, but they only did what a news organization is SUPPOSE to do. Report.
And yes…they do present a balance to all those lib networks out there. They also present both sides, which is more fair than any other network.
ENDLIB… That is one GREAT source!! Thanks
You are suggesting that Shirley’s comments wouldn’t be considered racist if she were white and said what she did about blacks? She may have had an "Epiphany" but is still a biggot. Or is this the same as Robert Byrd’s "Epiphany" that he shouldn’t hang black people from trees?
You ask this as if libs never take stuff out of context or worse, just make sh!t up.
The whole media should be embarrassed for taking his out of context video seriously. Regardless of political leanings, our media is too focused on sensation to make sure their facts are correct.
I find it strange that many conservatives are unwilling to simply denounce a blogger.
There is definitely plenty of blame to be found in the Sherrod story. However, knowing that Breitbart is a propagandist, who shares his edited videos to Fox because it fits their narrative of a continuous negative Obama campaign. The administration should learn an indelible lesson about rushing to judgment before the facts are known.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/opinion/25rich.html?src=me&ref=general
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/21/AR2010072105169.html
http://www.thenation.com/blog/37847/reverse-racism-weapon-mass-distraction
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/07/sherrod-breitbart-and-vilsack/60202/